to be hardened against all danger of the world and loss and love
and miss out?
or to be unrestrained and crazy and all-in when it comes to love
and get your heart broken and hurt and bruised.
I'm leaning towards the first.
Sometimes, the fact that I'm an "all-or-nothing" type of person is annoying.
It means I stink at balancing.
It means I stink at restraint.
What would be worse?
To miss out on love?
or to never be hurt by it?
It doesn't seem like I can avoid either.
I have to either be missing out or hurting.
There has to be a balance between being a hardened stoic and being dangerously passionate.
Because the former is an empty house
and the latter is a full house.
But only full of cats.
Because only cats can deal with the emotional basket-case of a person that results from being dangerously passionate.
And even a house full of cats will leave you empty.
and the latter is a full house.
But only full of cats.
Because only cats can deal with the emotional basket-case of a person that results from being dangerously passionate.
And even a house full of cats will leave you empty.
No comments :
Post a Comment